Here are the differences I see between coaches and mentors:
1. to me coaching is about improving performance first and the person second. I see mentors focused on individual growth, holistically, rather than specific or particular performance.
2. I think the coach gets his power or authority from the formal position that he holds on the team or organization and his role is generally well understood and standardized, whereas a mentor I think shapes his role in consultation with his partner.
3. I think coaches are taking specific looks at improving performance on a particular task and usually as a member of the team whereas I think the mentor is considering positive personal growth that spans a career or an entire life.
4. I think mentors get chosen by the junior partner whereas coaches are assigned to a team in your on the team so that your coach and perhaps the only choice you have is whether or not to join the team.
5. I think coaches have standardized templates of high-performance that’s related to specific tasks whereas mentors develop the agenda for growth after consulting with their junior partner.
6. I know a lot of people that don’t have mentors and yet seem to do just fine, whereas I cannot imagine a team that would do very well without a coach
7. I think there are many times when coaches can be directive and authoritarian, whereas a mentor just about has to be Socratic to be effective since everything is about the inner life of the junior partner whereas in coaching it’s about the team
Related articles by Zemanta
- Five Powers of Coaching (thecustomercollective.com)
- What can coaching (or mentoring) do for you? (slideshare.net)
- Preparing for Being Mentored (christopherscottblog.typepad.com)
- Improvement Now Made Easier With Self-Improvement-Life-Coach.com (prweb.com)
- My Secret to Success (biztipsblog.com)
- Most Critics Believe They are Mentors (startupprofessionals.com)
- Julia Stewart, Coach and Trainer of Masterful Coaches (deswalsh.com)